| 摘 要: 评估南京铁路管辖区作业场所职业卫生管理质量，并探讨监管策略，为铁路用人单位更好地完善职业卫生管理体系提供科学依据。方法 采用职业卫生管理评价法并结合职业病危害现状综合评价方法分析评估南京铁路辖区职业卫生管理质量。结果 南京铁路辖区职业病危害作业场所岗位职业危害现状综合评价:轻微危害、一般危害、较严重危害、严重危害各为1、25、9、6个，各占2.44%、60.98%、21.95%、14.63%，以一般危害最多；各岗位职业卫生管质量分级为：不及格、及格、一般、良好、优秀各为20、5、10、5、1个，各占48.78%、12.20%、24.39%、12.20%、2.44%，以不及格率最高；需要监督监测的频率以1次/年最多；监管方式包括了简化监管、常规监管、强化监管、重点监管，以常规监管多见。结论 南京铁路管辖区作业场所职业卫生管理质量不高，应采取有效监管措施，不断提高职业卫生监管水平，促使职业病危害风险程度降低。 |
| 关键词: 职业卫生 监督管理 质量评估 对策 |
|
中图分类号:
文献标识码:
|
| 基金项目: |
|
|
|
zhanglin
|
|
Nanjing Center for Disease Controle and Prevention of China railway Shanghai bureau group co. LTD.
|
| Abstract: [abstract]Objective To evaluate the quality of occupational health management in the workplace of nanjing railway jurisdiction, and to explore the regulatory strategy, so as to provide scientific basis for the railway employers to better improve the occupational health management system. Methods The quality of occupational health management in nanjing railway district was analyzed and evaluated by the method of occupational health management evaluation and the method of comprehensive evaluation of occupational hazards. Results The comprehensive evaluation of occupational hazards in the workplace under the jurisdiction of nanjing railway: slight hazard, general hazard, relatively serious hazard and serious hazard are respectively 1, 25, 9 and 6, accounting for 2.44%, 60.98%, 21.95% and 14.63% respectively, with the general hazard being the most. The occupational health management quality grades for each position are: fail, pass, average, good, excellent 20, 5, 10, 5, 1, accounting for 48.78%, 12.20%, 24.39%, 12.20%, 2.44%, with the highest failure rate; Monitoring needs to be monitored at most once a year; The e supervision methods include simplified supervision, regular supervision, strengthened supervision and key supervision, with regular supervision being more common. Conclusion The quality of occupational health management in workplaces in nanjing railway jurisdiction was not high, and effective supervision measures should be taken to continuously improve the level of occupational health supervision and reduce the risk of occupational diseases. |
| Keywords: Occupational health Supervision and management Quality assessment Countermeasures |
