摘 要: 探讨民航手工搬运作业人员肌肉骨骼损伤(MSDs) 风险影响因素的评价指标体系的建立和权重确定。方法 通过理论分析、专家调查和问卷调查等方式, 分析影响民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs 风险的多方面因素,以工作、生理、心理、环境和行李等5 个因素为准则, 构建了民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs 风险评价指标体系, 是基于序关系分析法(G1 法) 对作业人员肌肉骨骼损伤状况进行的评判, 并确定了指标体系中各指标的权重, 建立了民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs 风险三级综合评价指标体系, 将第三层子因素的MSDs 风险分为五个等级进行分级量化,每名手工搬运作业人员MSDs 指标分别对应不同的损伤程度。结果 根据建立的综合评价指标体系编制民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs 风险自测调查问卷, 实现了民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs 风险综合量化评价。结论 由于民航手工搬运作业人员MSDs 风险影响因素的多样性和复杂性, 评价指标体系建立和权重确定较为困难。G1 法为该作业群体MSDs 风险评价提供了一种切实可行的思路。 |
关键词: 手工搬运提举 肌肉骨骼损伤(MSDs) 风险综合量化评价体系 |
中图分类号:
文献标识码:
|
基金项目: “十二五” 科技支撑项目(编号: 2014BAI12B03) |
|
Research of comprehensive quantitative evaluation system on risk of musculoskeletal damages in manual handling workers of civil aviation |
Tang Lihua, Tian Lingling, Wang Zhongxu, Lyu Haifeng
|
Civil Aviation Management Institute of China, Beijing 100102, China
|
Abstract: To discuss the comprehensive quantitative evaluation system on risk of musculoskeletal damages(MSDs) in manual handling workers of civil aviation and the determination of weights Methods By theoretical analysis, expert survey and questionnaire, the influential factors for the risk of MSDs in manual handling workers of civil aviation were analyzed,five factors such as working load, physiological situation, psychological and luggage condition were taken as the basic criteria,and a comprehensive quantitative evaluation system for risk of MSDs in manual handling workers of civil aviation was established and the order relation analysis method (G1 method) was used to calculate the weights of indexes, thus, the three grade compre⁃
hensive evaluation system for risk of MSDs was established Then, the third level of WMSDs index were quantized by divided into five grades, the MSDs indices of the workers might respectively correspond to different degrees of MSDs. Results Through the statistical analysis of the questionnaires on risk of MSDs in manual handling workers of civil aviation based on the basis of comprehensive quantitative evaluation system the comprehensive quantitative evaluation of MSDs risk in manual handling workers of civil aviation was realized. Conclusion The results showed that the comprehensive quantitative evaluation system provides a practical way for the evaluation of MSDs risk in manual handling workers of civil aviation. |
Keywords: manual handling workers musculoskeletal damages (MSDs) comprehensive quantitative evaluation system for risk |